Democratic power
Representation, voting access, district design, emergency authority, money, and the rules that decide whose consent counts.
Project Shadow 1.0.1 contains no Myth package. Generic Myth v0.2.0 and Full-Canon Myth v0.3.5 are separate optional companions; both default off, neither is required by R1, and neither can authorize action or change an R1 result. ARM remains a civic repair workshop, not a certification service; publication transfers no authority and is not operational deployment, efficacy, safety, certification, a legal-compliance finding, permission to act, or a global green.
One civic lifecycle / six distinct public doors
The RecordremembersCivic QAinspectsPBHPpausesARMrepairsProject Shadowinstruments + testsALMSIVIpreserves optional originCHAMBER 03 / REPAIR LIBRARY
A reform is not a repair merely because it is well intended. The mechanism, authority, burden, safeguard, implementation path, and effectiveness test must fit the diagnosed failure.
SIX CONNECTED DOMAINS
Democratic rules shape public capacity. Economic power shapes political voice. Information systems shape consent. Rights shape the limits. AI can accelerate every one of those systems.
Representation, voting access, district design, emergency authority, money, and the rules that decide whose consent counts.
Public claims, records, corrections, media incentives, propaganda, platform design, and synthetic content.
Work, wages, monopoly, housing, health, debt, procurement, ownership, and the ability to refuse unsafe conditions.
Due process, equal protection, policing, detention, surveillance, disability, privacy, and access to remedy.
Agencies, staffing, service delivery, emergency response, maintenance, and the quiet machinery that makes rights real.
Training data, models, agents, ranking, monitoring, vendor claims, automated action, and institutional adoption.
RUN ACROSS EVERY PROPOSAL
A repair can succeed inside one department while exporting cost, risk, or coercion to another. These cross-cuts keep the whole consequence chain visible.
Who decides, funds, implements, benefits, audits, appeals, and can stop the action?
Who waits, pays, proves eligibility, loses privacy, accepts risk, or lacks a practical exit?
Where do data, models, rankings, interfaces, or agents alter judgment, access, surveillance, or scale?
What public evidence would show implementation, distribution, failure, correction, and recurrence?