Project Shadow 1.0.1 contains no Myth package. Generic Myth v0.2.0 and Full-Canon Myth v0.3.5 are separate optional companions; both default off, neither is required by R1, and neither can authorize action or change an R1 result. ARM remains a civic repair workshop, not a certification service; publication transfers no authority and is not operational deployment, efficacy, safety, certification, a legal-compliance finding, permission to act, or a global green.
Start with a ten-question values map. Then define one exact candidate, office, jurisdiction, cycle, claim, and review scope before testing it through eight evidence lenses, six non-averageable hard stops, a public formula, and a local receipt you can challenge or correct.
SHORT VOTER PATH → COMPLETE EVIDENCE AUDIT
Know the baseline. Scope the claim. Inspect the record.
The quick path tells you how your answers map to this Manual's openly published values. The complete path tests a candidate's words, record, funding, contradictions, foreseeable harm, consistency, and correction history. Neither produces an endorsement.
VIEWPOINT DISCLOSUREValues-driven. Evidence-disciplined. The scoring map is public.
Authored by Phillip Linstrum from a real democratic-socialist perspective: democracy should reach the economy; workers deserve power; essential needs should not be held hostage by private profit; markets and small businesses can exist; and concentrated wealth must not be able to buy public power. The evidence rules are the same for every candidate.
START STATEBlank by default. Nothing is preselected.
Client-side only. Demonstrations are invented fixtures—not real candidates, claims, or findings.
01 / QUICK PATH
Map your values first.
This measures alignment with the Manual’s published baseline—not whether your politics are “correct,” and not how any candidate scores. Answer at least eight for a profile.
PUBLIC FORMULA
Points earned ÷ (4 × answered questions). Fewer than eight answers remains Incomplete. No question is reverse-coded or secretly weighted.
V1Democracy and moneyskip
V2Labor powerskip
V3Material securityskip
V4Markets and public powerskip
V5Rights and recourseskip
V6Democratic legitimacyskip
V7Nonviolence and human dignityskip
V8Implementation and receiptsskip
V9Accountable AIskip
V10Correction and oversightskip
# ARM Candidate Evidence Receipt
Generated: Generated when exported or printed
Local change ID: 58b82be1fb98a803 (FNV-1a 64-bit; deterministic comparison only, not a cryptographic signature, authentication, or custody proof)
Method: ARM-CANDIDATE-1.0.0
## Boundary
Local user-generated evidence receipt; not an endorsement, neutral oracle, voting instruction, fact-checking service, legal conclusion, official Civic QA review, cryptographic signature, authentication, or custody proof.
Creator-led by Phillip Linstrum; model-assisted research organization, drafting, coding, testing, and comparison; not independent validation.
## Subject and scope
- Candidate: Not entered
- Office: Not entered
- Jurisdiction: Not entered
- Election/review date: Not entered
- Party/affiliation (context only; never scored): Not entered / not scored
- Incumbency: UNKNOWN
- Candidate source: Not entered
- Reviewer: Anonymous
- Review date: Generated
- Scope: Not entered
## Values profile
This measures alignment with the Manual’s published baseline, not a diagnosis of the visitor’s politics.
- Answered: 0/10
- Formula: points earned / (4 × answered questions)
- Result: Incomplete% — INCOMPLETE
- V1 Democracy and money: SKIP
- V2 Labor power: SKIP
- V3 Material security: SKIP
- V4 Markets and public power: SKIP
- V5 Rights and recourse: SKIP
- V6 Democratic legitimacy: SKIP
- V7 Nonviolence and human dignity: SKIP
- V8 Implementation and receipts: SKIP
- V9 Accountable AI: SKIP
- V10 Correction and oversight: SKIP
## Candidate claim
- Benchmark: CUSTOM — Not entered
- Exact claim: Not entered
- Exact quote: Not entered
- Candidate response: UNKNOWN
- Response date: Not entered
## Deterministic evidence result
- Gate: OPEN_INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE
- Coverage: 0% (0/8 applicable lenses)
- Evidence alignment: Unknown%
- Rule: a hard stop, rights failure, or unresolved severe harm cannot be averaged away.
- Flags: 6 hard-stop checks not reviewed; Missing required scope: Candidate name, Office sought or held, Jurisdiction, Election or review cycle, Review scope, Review date, Benchmark title, Exact candidate claim
### L1 — Position
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
### L2 — Public evidence
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
### L3 — Governing record / votes
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
### L4 — Funding and conflicts
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
### L5 — Contradictions
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
### L6 — PBHP harm risk
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
### L7 — Consistency / trust
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
### L8 — Correction history
- State: UNKNOWN
- Points: excluded / unknown
- Rationale: Not entered
- Evidence: None linked
## Hard-stop checks
- H1 Election rejection: NOT_REVIEWED — No rationale entered; evidence none linked
- H2 Political violence: NOT_REVIEWED — No rationale entered; evidence none linked
- H3 Closed due process: NOT_REVIEWED — No rationale entered; evidence none linked
- H4 Corruption / concealed conflict: NOT_REVIEWED — No rationale entered; evidence none linked
- H5 Unappealable automation: NOT_REVIEWED — No rationale entered; evidence none linked
- H6 Authority beyond review: NOT_REVIEWED — No rationale entered; evidence none linked
## Open questions
None entered
## Sources
### S1 — Untitled source
- Publisher: Not entered
- URL/reference: Not entered
- Published: Not entered
- Accessed: Not entered
- Locator / exact quote: Not entered
- Claim state: UNKNOWN
- Archive: Not entered
## Correction path
Publish a dated correction with the changed evidence, reasoning, and resulting gate.
## Notes
None entered
---
Correction invited. Preserve the source trail, review scope, timestamp, and changed reasoning.
REQUIRED RECEIPTPublish the review scope, formula, unknowns, N/A rationales, hard-stop checks, sources, timestamp, and correction invitation—not just the label.
Boundary: this is not a neutral oracle, endorsement, voting instruction, fact-checking service, legal conclusion, or official Civic QA review. It creates a local, user-generated receipt. Its FNV-1a change ID is not a cryptographic signature, authentication, or custody proof. Unknown stays unknown; different reviewers may reasonably disagree; preserve the source trail and correction path.